
Ryzen 5 7645HX
Popular choices:

Xeon E7-8880 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7645HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon E7-8880 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8880 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads.
Xeon E7-8880 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7645HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,966 vs 26,097).
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Ryzen 5 7645HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7645HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 7645HX
2023Xeon E7-8880 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon E7-8880 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8880 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7645HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,966 vs 26,097).
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Ryzen 5 7645HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7645HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7645HX better than Xeon E7-8880 v2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7645HX | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7645HX | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 631 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 335 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 273 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7645HX | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 652 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 590 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 652 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 631 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 597 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 531 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 271 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7645HX | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 652 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 652 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 652 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 632 FPS |
| ultra | 570 FPS | 521 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 586 FPS | 634 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 476 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 397 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7645HX and Xeon E7-8880 v2


Ryzen 5 7645HX
Ryzen 5 7645HX
The Ryzen 5 7645HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,097 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E7-8880 v2
Xeon E7-8880 v2
The Xeon E7-8880 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 25,966 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7645HX packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E7-8880 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-8880 v2 has 9 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7645HX versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E7-8880 v2 — a 46.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7645HX (base: 4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7645HX is built on the Dragon Range (Zen4) (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7645HX scores 26,097 against the Xeon E7-8880 v2's 25,966 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 7645HX. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7645HX vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-8880 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7645HX | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 15 / 30+150% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+61% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+60% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 37.5 MB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 5 nm-77% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Dragon Range (Zen4) (2023) | — |
| PassMark | 26,097 | 25,966 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,985 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,588 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,717 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7645HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-8880 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7645HX | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 7645HX) / not specified (Xeon E7-8880 v2). The Ryzen 5 7645HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Xeon E7-8880 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7645HX targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7645HX rivals Core i5-13500HX.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7645HX | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 610M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V (SVM) | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











