
Core Ultra 5 245
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 245
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 32.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌6.7% HIGHER MSRP$319 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,325 vs 40,165).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 94.7 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Core Ultra 5 245
2025Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 32.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌6.7% HIGHER MSRP$319 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,325 vs 40,165).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 94.7 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 245 better than Ryzen 5 7600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 509 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 845 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 613 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 525 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 730 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 441 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1004 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 956 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 834 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 758 FPS | 708 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 865 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 764 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 663 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 589 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 585 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 472 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 245 and Ryzen 5 7600X

Core Ultra 5 245
Core Ultra 5 245
The Core Ultra 5 245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,165 points. Launch price was $270.


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 245 packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 245 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245 scores 40,165 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 34.6% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.7 GHz+34% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | 6 MB+100% |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 40,165+42% | 28,325 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 15,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,800 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 245 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600X — the Core Ultra 5 245 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 245 supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 5 245) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+127900% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 128 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 7600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 5 7600X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics (Core Ultra 5 245) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 7600X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 245 rivals Ryzen 5 9600X; Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 5 245 launched at $319 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($319 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 245 delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Core Ultra 5 245 the 28.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $319 | $299-6% |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.9+33% | 94.7 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












