
Ryzen 5 7600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,500 vs 16,000).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $229 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 7600.
Ryzen 5 7600
2023Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,500 vs 16,000).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $229 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 7600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS better than Ryzen 5 7600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 504 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 657 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 575 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 559 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 675 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 675 FPS | 683 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 675 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 666 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 454 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS


Ryzen 5 7600
Ryzen 5 7600
The Ryzen 5 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,013 points. Launch price was $229.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600 versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600 uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600 scores 27,013 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,500 vs 16,000 (9.8% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 2,605, a 7.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,000 vs 10,348 (14.8% advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB+700% |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 27,013 | 27,318+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,500 | 16,000+10% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,800+7% | 2,605 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,000+16% | 10,348 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7600 uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 7600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 5 7600) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — the Ryzen 5 7600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A620,B650,X670,B840,B850,X870 (Ryzen 5 7600) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 7600) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600 rivals Core i5-13400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics (2-core) | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












