Ryzen 5 7535HS
Popular choices:
Xeon W-2145
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7535HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2145 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,820 vs 18,024).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2145, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-2145
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,113 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7535HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7535HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7535HS
2023Xeon W-2145
2017Why buy it
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2145 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,820 vs 18,024).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2145, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,113 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7535HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7535HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-2145 better than Ryzen 5 7535HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7535HS | Xeon W-2145 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7535HS | Xeon W-2145 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 165 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7535HS | Xeon W-2145 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 446 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 344 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 446 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 308 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7535HS | Xeon W-2145 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 446 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 446 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 446 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 446 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 446 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7535HS and Xeon W-2145
Ryzen 5 7535HS
Ryzen 5 7535HS
The Ryzen 5 7535HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.55 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 17,820 points. Launch price was $299.
Xeon W-2145
Xeon W-2145
The Xeon W-2145 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,024 points. Launch price was $1,113.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7535HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-2145 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-2145 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.55 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7535HS versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-2145 — a 1.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7535HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7535HS uses the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon W-2145 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7535HS scores 17,820 against the Xeon W-2145's 18,024 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon W-2145. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7535HS vs 11 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2145.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7535HS | Xeon W-2145 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.55 GHz+1% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+45% | 11 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 6 nm-57% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 17,820 | 18,024+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7535HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2145 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7535HS | Xeon W-2145 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 512 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 5 7535HS and Xeon W-2145
