
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-3323
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $650 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 149.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 29.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 220W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 27,822).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3323, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Xeon W-3323
2021Why buy it
- ✅+27.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($949 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌238.5% higher power demand at 220W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Xeon W-3323
2021Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $650 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 149.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 29.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 220W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+27.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 27,822).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3323, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($949 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌238.5% higher power demand at 220W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Xeon W-3323?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 162 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 696 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 696 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 608 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 273 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 696 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 696 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 602 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 533 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 338 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Xeon W-3323


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3323
Xeon W-3323
The Xeon W-3323 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,822 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-3323 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon W-3323 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-3323 — a 16.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-3323 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Xeon W-3323's 27,822 — a 24.1% lead for the Xeon W-3323. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3323.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+18% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+6% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+78% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 21,845 | 27,822+27% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3323 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Xeon W-3323). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3323 debuted at $949. On MSRP ($299 vs $949), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $650 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600X delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 29.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3323 — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 85.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-68% | $949 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1+149% | 29.3 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












