
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-10855M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 103.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
- ❌4233.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 1.5W.
Xeon W-10855M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $181 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.8 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($118 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,249 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Xeon W-10855M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $181 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.8 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($118 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 103.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
- ❌4233.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 1.5W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,249 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Xeon W-10855M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 294 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Xeon W-10855M


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-10855M
Xeon W-10855M
The Xeon W-10855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,249 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 5600X and Xeon W-10855M share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-10855M — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10855M (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-10855M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Xeon W-10855M's 12,249 — a 56.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 12 MB on the Xeon W-10855M.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+32% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.5 MB+200% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Comet Lake-H (2020) |
| PassMark | 21,845+78% | 12,249 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-10855M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Xeon W-10855M). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon W-10855M debuted at $118. On MSRP ($299 vs $118), the Xeon W-10855M is $181 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600X delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 103.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-10855M — making the Xeon W-10855M the 34.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $118-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1 | 103.8+42% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












