
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Xeon Phi 7290
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.1% higher average FPS across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 245W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon Phi 7290 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Phi 7290
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,839 vs 21,845).
- ❌276.9% higher power demand at 245W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Xeon Phi 7290
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.1% higher average FPS across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 245W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon Phi 7290 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,839 vs 21,845).
- ❌276.9% higher power demand at 245W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Xeon Phi 7290?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 209 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 420 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 310 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Xeon Phi 7290


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Phi 7290
Xeon Phi 7290
The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 66 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 92.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 20.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 72 / 288+1100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+171% | 1.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+147% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 0 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Knights Landing (2016) |
| PassMark | 21,845+22% | 17,839 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Xeon Phi 7290). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












