Ryzen 5 5600X vs Xeon Phi 7290

AMD

Ryzen 5 5600X

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Phi 7290

72 Cores288 Thrd245 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2016

Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 5600X

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +27.1% higher average FPS across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 245W, a 180W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon Phi 7290 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Phi 7290

2016

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (17,839 vs 21,845).
  • 276.9% higher power demand at 245W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Xeon Phi 7290?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Phi 7290 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5600X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 5600X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 27.1% more average FPS across 16 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 5600X is the better fit. You are getting 22.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 5600X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 5600X is at an unclear MSRP at $299 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 27.1% average FPS lead across 16 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (73.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 5600X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 72/288. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 5600XXeon Phi 7290
1080p
low203 FPS177 FPS
medium174 FPS143 FPS
high140 FPS113 FPS
ultra107 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low169 FPS141 FPS
medium141 FPS111 FPS
high113 FPS87 FPS
ultra86 FPS68 FPS
4K
low85 FPS66 FPS
medium76 FPS56 FPS
high60 FPS43 FPS
ultra47 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 5600XXeon Phi 7290
1080p
low464 FPS136 FPS
medium387 FPS120 FPS
high324 FPS109 FPS
ultra291 FPS86 FPS
1440p
low397 FPS120 FPS
medium334 FPS108 FPS
high290 FPS97 FPS
ultra253 FPS77 FPS
4K
low263 FPS87 FPS
medium226 FPS81 FPS
high205 FPS72 FPS
ultra171 FPS56 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 5600XXeon Phi 7290
1080p
low546 FPS446 FPS
medium473 FPS446 FPS
high432 FPS446 FPS
ultra358 FPS446 FPS
1440p
low508 FPS446 FPS
medium413 FPS434 FPS
high375 FPS374 FPS
ultra312 FPS326 FPS
4K
low348 FPS394 FPS
medium292 FPS306 FPS
high255 FPS259 FPS
ultra199 FPS209 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 5600XXeon Phi 7290
1080p
low546 FPS446 FPS
medium546 FPS446 FPS
high546 FPS446 FPS
ultra546 FPS446 FPS
1440p
low546 FPS446 FPS
medium546 FPS446 FPS
high546 FPS446 FPS
ultra524 FPS420 FPS
4K
low529 FPS446 FPS
medium484 FPS405 FPS
high435 FPS361 FPS
ultra379 FPS310 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Xeon Phi 7290

AMD

Ryzen 5 5600X

The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon Phi 7290

The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 66 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 92.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 20.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.

FeatureRyzen 5 5600XXeon Phi 7290
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
72 / 288+1100%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+171%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+147%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB
0 kB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark
21,845+22%
17,839
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 5600XXeon Phi 7290
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Xeon Phi 7290). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.

FeatureRyzen 5 5600XXeon Phi 7290
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop