
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5317
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $789 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,088 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 189.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 25.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,088 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 27,448).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5317, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Xeon Gold 5317
2021Why buy it
- ✅+25.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.2 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,088 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Xeon Gold 5317
2021Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $789 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,088 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 189.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 25.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,088 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+25.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 27,448).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5317, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.2 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,088 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Xeon Gold 5317?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 127 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 686 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 686 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 686 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 641 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 607 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 536 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 686 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 519 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 330 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Xeon Gold 5317


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 5317
Xeon Gold 5317
The Xeon Gold 5317 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,448 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5317 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 5317 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5317 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5317 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Xeon Gold 5317's 27,448 — a 22.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 5317. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5317.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+28% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+23% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+78% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 21,845 | 27,448+26% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5317 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5317). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5317 debuted at $1088. On MSRP ($299 vs $1088), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $789 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600X delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 25.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5317 — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 97.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-73% | $1088 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1+190% | 25.2 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












