
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2695 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,835 vs 21,845).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,835 vs 21,845).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Xeon E5-2695 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 467 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 356 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Xeon E5-2695 v4


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2695 v4
Xeon E5-2695 v4
The Xeon E5-2695 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,835 points. Launch price was $2,424.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 — a 32.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Xeon E5-2695 v4's 18,835 — a 14.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2695 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 18 / 36+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+39% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+76% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 45 MB+41% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4.5 MB+800% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 21,845+16% | 18,835 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Xeon E5-2695 v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












