
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Xeon D-1746TER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 67W, a 2W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1746TER, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon D-1746TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-1746TER
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,660 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Xeon D-1746TER
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 67W, a 2W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1746TER, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon D-1746TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,660 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Xeon D-1746TER?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon D-1746TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon D-1746TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon D-1746TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 344 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 223 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon D-1746TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 309 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Xeon D-1746TER


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-1746TER
Xeon D-1746TER
The Xeon D-1746TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,660 points. Launch price was $1,069.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1746TER offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon D-1746TER has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1746TER — a 39% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon D-1746TER uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Xeon D-1746TER's 15,660 — a 33% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon D-1746TER.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon D-1746TER |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+48% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+85% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+113% | 15 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 21,845+39% | 15,660 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1746TER uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon D-1746TER |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2227 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Xeon D-1746TER). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon D-1746TER |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












