
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Xeon D-1736NT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 67W, a 2W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1736NT, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon D-1736NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-1736NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,826 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Xeon D-1736NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 67W, a 2W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1736NT, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon D-1736NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,826 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Xeon D-1736NT?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 109 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 236 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 326 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Xeon D-1736NT


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-1736NT
Xeon D-1736NT
The Xeon D-1736NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,826 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1736NT offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon D-1736NT has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1736NT — a 27.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X is built on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Xeon D-1736NT's 17,826 — a 20.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1736NT.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+31% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+37% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+113% | 15 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | — |
| PassMark | 21,845+23% | 17,826 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1736NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2227 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Xeon D-1736NT). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon D-1736NT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












