
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $850 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 150.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 29.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 33,455).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.1 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $850 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 150.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 29.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 33,455).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.1 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 557 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 351 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 568 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 494 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 599 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 243 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 836 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 836 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 823 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 725 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 836 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 745 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 630 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 540 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 405 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,455 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX's 33,455 — a 42% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+7% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Castle Peak (2020) |
| PassMark | 21,845 | 33,455+53% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,652 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX rivals Xeon w5-2455X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX debuted at $1149. On MSRP ($299 vs $1149), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $850 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600X delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 29.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 86% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-74% | $1149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1+151% | 29.1 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












