
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 164.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 22,066).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Ryzen Threadripper 1920
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 164.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 22,066).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 398 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 145 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 252 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 552 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 528 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 318 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen Threadripper 1920


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 19% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920. Both processors carry 32 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+21% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+16% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,845 | 22,066+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 debuted at $799. On MSRP ($299 vs $799), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $500 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600X delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 27.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 90.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-63% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1+165% | 27.6 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












