
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 3900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 61.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 30,588).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 3900.
Ryzen 9 3900
2019Why buy it
- ✅+40% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Ryzen 5 5600X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.3 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Ryzen 9 3900
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 61.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+40% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Ryzen 5 5600X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 30,588).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 3900.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.3 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Ryzen 9 3900?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 534 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 213 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 589 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 347 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 224 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 765 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 711 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 638 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 725 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 553 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 360 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 9 3900


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 3900
Ryzen 9 3900
The Ryzen 9 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 30,588 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 3900 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 3900 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 3900 uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Ryzen 9 3900's 30,588 — a 33.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 3900. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+7% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+19% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,845 | 30,588+40% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 17,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,713 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,983 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X) and X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 3900).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop, Ryzen 9 3900 targets Workstation Desktop (low power). Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 3900 rivals Core i9-9900.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Workstation Desktop (low power) |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 3900 debuted at $499. On MSRP ($299 vs $499), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600X delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 61.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 3900 — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 17.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 9 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-40% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1+19% | 61.3 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












