
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 24,531).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 24,531).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 214 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 613 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 343 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 613 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 613 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 613 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 549 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5x, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,531 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U uses Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U's 24,531 — a 11.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+12% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 21,845 | 24,531+12% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












