
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Delivers 42.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 51.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,342 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.3 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Delivers 42.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 51.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,342 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.3 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 168 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,342 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — a 11.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700's 15,342 — a 35% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+12% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+16% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 21,845+42% | 15,342 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 debuted at $299. On MSRP ($299 vs $299), the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600X delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 51.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 35% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1+42% | 51.3 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













