
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 8840HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840HS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 25,156).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 8840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.5% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Ryzen 7 8840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.5% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840HS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 25,156).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8840HS better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 410 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 202 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 629 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 594 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 345 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 629 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 629 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 629 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 7 8840HS


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 8840HS
Ryzen 7 8840HS
The Ryzen 7 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,156 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 8840HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HS — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HS (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Ryzen 7 8840HS's 25,156 — a 14.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 8840HS. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+12% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 21,845 | 25,156+15% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Ryzen 7 8840HS). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












