
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 4800HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 4800HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 4800HS
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,016 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Ryzen 7 4800HS
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 4800HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,016 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Ryzen 7 4800HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 4800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 4800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 4800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 450 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 450 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 400 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 271 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 4800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 450 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 450 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 401 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 348 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 292 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 7 4800HS


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 4800HS
Ryzen 7 4800HS
The Ryzen 7 4800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,016 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 4800HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 4800HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4800HS — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 4800HS uses Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Ryzen 7 4800HS's 18,016 — a 19.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 4800HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 4800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+10% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+28% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+300% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 21,845+21% | 18,016 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 4800HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 4800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Ryzen 7 4800HS). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 4800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












