
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 22,373).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
2024Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 22,373).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 164 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 559 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 355 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 293 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 559 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 559 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 531 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 411 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,373 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U's 22,373 — a 2.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+6% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 21,845 | 22,373+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












