
M2 Pro 10-Core
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M2 Pro 10-Core
2023Why buy it
- β +0.4% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 36W instead of 65W, a 29W reduction.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (21,845 vs 21,939).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while M2 Pro 10-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β80.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 36W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M2 Pro 10-Core moves to none and DDR5.
M2 Pro 10-Core
2023Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- β +0.4% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 36W instead of 65W, a 29W reduction.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (21,845 vs 21,939).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while M2 Pro 10-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β80.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 36W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M2 Pro 10-Core moves to none and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is M2 Pro 10-Core better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M2 Pro 10-Core | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M2 Pro 10-Core | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 314 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 283 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M2 Pro 10-Core | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 419 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M2 Pro 10-Core | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 548 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 535 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 458 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M2 Pro 10-Core and Ryzen 5 5600X
M2 Pro 10-Core
M2 Pro 10-Core
The M2 Pro 10-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.42 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MBΒ +Β 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,939 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The M2 Pro 10-Core packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the M2 Pro 10-Core has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the M2 Pro 10-Core versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X β a 21.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 2.42 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X is built on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Pro 10-Core scores 21,939 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 β a 0.4% lead for the M2 Pro 10-Core. L3 cache: 24 MB on the M2 Pro 10-Core vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | M2 Pro 10-Core | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.6 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 2.42 GHz | 3.7 GHz+53% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+7100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | β | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) |
| PassMark | 21,939 | 21,845 |
Memory & Platform
The M2 Pro 10-Core uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M2 Pro 10-Core | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (M2 Pro 10-Core) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | M2 Pro 10-Core | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












