
EPYC 7F32
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7F32
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,801 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 559.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 11.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7F32 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 23,253).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7F32, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
EPYC 7F32
2020Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,801 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 559.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 11.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7F32 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 23,253).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7F32, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7F32 better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 379 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 466 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 401 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 581 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 581 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 564 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 479 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 5 5600X

EPYC 7F32
EPYC 7F32
The EPYC 7F32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,253 points. Launch price was $2,100.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7F32 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7F32 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F32 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 16.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 7F32 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F32 scores 23,253 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 6.2% lead for the EPYC 7F32. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F32 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.6 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 23,253+6% | 21,845 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7F32 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7F32) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7F32 launched at $2100 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($2100 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $1801 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7F32 delivers 11.1 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 147.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2100 | $299-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | 73.1+559% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












