PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7662

2020

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 256 MB vs 32 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($6,150 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.

Ryzen 5 5600X

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,851 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 521.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (32 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 72,298).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7662, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7662

2020

Ryzen 5 5600X

2020

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 256 MB vs 32 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,851 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 521.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($6,150 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (32 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 72,298).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7662, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7662 better than Ryzen 5 5600X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7662 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5600X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7662 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 256 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7662 is the better fit. You are getting 231% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7662 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 5600X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 7662 is 1956.9% more expensive on MSRP at $6,150 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 5600X is also 521.5% better value on MSRP (73.1 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7662 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 6/12. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7662 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 5600X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7662	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	192 FPS	203 FPS
medium	156 FPS	174 FPS
high	125 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	107 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	169 FPS
medium	122 FPS	141 FPS
high	94 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	85 FPS
medium	60 FPS	76 FPS
high	47 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	47 FPS

Open EPYC 7662 Open Ryzen 5 5600X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7662	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	249 FPS	464 FPS
medium	220 FPS	387 FPS
high	182 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	145 FPS	291 FPS
1440p
low	204 FPS	397 FPS
medium	185 FPS	334 FPS
high	158 FPS	290 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	253 FPS
4K
low	127 FPS	263 FPS
medium	117 FPS	226 FPS
high	102 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	171 FPS

Open EPYC 7662 Open Ryzen 5 5600X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7662	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	722 FPS	546 FPS
medium	590 FPS	473 FPS
high	513 FPS	432 FPS
ultra	446 FPS	358 FPS
1440p
low	587 FPS	508 FPS
medium	486 FPS	413 FPS
high	423 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	368 FPS	312 FPS
4K
low	426 FPS	348 FPS
medium	330 FPS	292 FPS
high	281 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	199 FPS

Open EPYC 7662 Open Ryzen 5 5600X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7662	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	935 FPS	546 FPS
medium	846 FPS	546 FPS
high	724 FPS	546 FPS
ultra	624 FPS	546 FPS
1440p
low	721 FPS	546 FPS
medium	628 FPS	546 FPS
high	535 FPS	546 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	524 FPS
4K
low	514 FPS	529 FPS
medium	458 FPS	484 FPS
high	400 FPS	435 FPS
ultra	348 FPS	379 FPS

Open EPYC 7662 Open Ryzen 5 5600X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 5 5600X

EPYC 7662

The EPYC 7662 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 32 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 72,298 points. Launch price was $6,700.

Ryzen 5 5600X

The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7662 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7662 has 58 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7662 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 32.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 7662 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7662 scores 72,298 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 107.2% lead for the EPYC 7662. L3 cache: 256 MB on the EPYC 7662 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.

Feature	EPYC 7662	Ryzen 5 5600X
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+967%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	4.6 GHz+39%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.7 GHz+85%
L3 Cache	256 MB+700%	32 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+6300%	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	72,298+231%	21,845

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7662 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7662 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the EPYC 7662 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7662 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7662) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7662) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the EPYC 7662 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7662) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).

Feature	EPYC 7662	Ryzen 5 5600X
Socket	SP3	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200+79900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	128 GB+3276700%
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7662) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7662 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.

Feature	EPYC 7662	Ryzen 5 5600X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7662 launched at $6150 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($6150 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $5851 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7662 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 144.6% better value option.