
EPYC 7401
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7401
2017Why buy it
- ✅+153.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.9 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,201 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 36.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 55,280).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7401, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7401
2017Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+153.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,201 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 36.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.9 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 55,280).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7401, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than EPYC 7401?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7401 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7401 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7401 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7401 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 834 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 758 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 651 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 667 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 584 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7401 and Ryzen 5 5600X

EPYC 7401
EPYC 7401
The EPYC 7401 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 55,280 points. Launch price was $1,850.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7401 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7401 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 7401 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7401 scores 55,280 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 86.7% lead for the EPYC 7401. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | EPYC 7401 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+53% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+85% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+100% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 55,280+153% | 21,845 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7401 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7401 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the EPYC 7401 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7401 supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7401) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7401) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the EPYC 7401 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7401) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).
| Feature | EPYC 7401 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666+66550% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 128 GB+6553500% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7401) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7401 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.
| Feature | EPYC 7401 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7401 launched at $1500 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($1500 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $1201 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7401 delivers 36.9 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 65.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7401 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | $299-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.9 | 73.1+98% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












