
Core i9-9900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-9900X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅83.3% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,655 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($989 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $690 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $989 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 233.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $989 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core i9-9900X
2018Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅83.3% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $690 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $989 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 233.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $989 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,655 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($989 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Core i9-9900X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 279 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 527 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 541 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9900X and Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i9-9900X
Core i9-9900X
The Core i9-9900X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,655 points. Launch price was $989.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9900X packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-9900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9900X versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-9900X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900X scores 21,655 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 32 MB+66% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 21,655 | 21,845 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,985 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,459 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,475 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9900X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-9900X) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600X). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-9900X) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the Core i9-9900X offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-9900X) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 44+83% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-9900X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9900X) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-9900X launched at $989 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($989 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $690 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9900X delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 107.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $989 | $299-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.9 | 73.1+234% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












