
Core i9-9900KS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-9900KS
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,397 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.8 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($513 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌95.4% higher power demand at 127W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+12.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $214 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $513 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 93.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 37.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $513 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 127W, a 62W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900KS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core i9-9900KS
2019Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+12.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $214 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $513 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 93.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 37.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $513 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 127W, a 62W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,397 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.8 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($513 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌95.4% higher power demand at 127W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900KS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Core i9-9900KS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900KS | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900KS | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 449 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-9900KS | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 454 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 462 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-9900KS | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 485 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 485 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9900KS and Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i9-9900KS
Core i9-9900KS
The Core i9-9900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 127 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,397 points. Launch price was $513.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9900KS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-9900KS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-9900KS versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-9900KS (base: 4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-9900KS uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900KS scores 19,397 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 11.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900KS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i9-9900KS | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+9% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+8% | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 19,397 | 21,845+13% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9900KS uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-9900KS | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-9900KS) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-9900KS | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-9900KS launched at $513 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($513 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $214 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9900KS delivers 37.8 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 63.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9900KS | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $513 | $299-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.8 | 73.1+93% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












