
Core i9-7940X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-7940X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+16.5% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 301.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 25,452).
Core i9-7940X
2017Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+16.5% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 301.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 25,452).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Core i9-7940X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 331 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 534 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 365 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 319 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 283 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 636 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 636 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 610 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 636 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 500 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-7940X and Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i9-7940X
Core i9-7940X
The Core i9-7940X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 25,452 points. Launch price was $1,399.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-7940X packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-7940X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7940X versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-7940X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-7940X scores 25,452 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 15.3% lead for the Core i9-7940X. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-7940X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 28+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 32 MB+66% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 25,452+17% | 21,845 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-7940X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-7940X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-7940X launched at $1399 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($1399 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $1100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-7940X delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 120.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1399 | $299-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.2 | 73.1+302% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











