
Core i9-14901E
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-14901E
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 54.4 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($557 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $258 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 54.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14901E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 30,298).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-14901E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14901E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-14901E
2024Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $258 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 54.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 54.4 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($557 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14901E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 30,298).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-14901E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14901E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-14901E better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-14901E | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-14901E | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 757 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 677 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 549 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 479 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 659 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 594 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 491 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 337 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 317 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-14901E | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 757 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 653 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 481 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 587 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 331 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-14901E | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 757 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 757 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 757 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 729 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 757 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 750 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 656 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 629 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 563 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 499 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-14901E and Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i9-14901E
Core i9-14901E
The Core i9-14901E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,298 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14901E packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-14901E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14901E versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 19.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-14901E (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-14901E uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14901E scores 30,298 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 32.4% lead for the Core i9-14901E. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14901E vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i9-14901E | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+22% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+13% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 30,298+39% | 21,845 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,894 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,262 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14901E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14901E versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the Core i9-14901E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-14901E supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14901E) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i9-14901E) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).
| Feature | Core i9-14901E | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (Core i9-14901E) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). The Core i9-14901E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 5600X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-14901E | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-14901E launched at $557 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($557 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $258 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14901E delivers 54.4 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 29.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14901E | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $557 | $299-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.4 | 73.1+34% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












