
Core i9-13900TE
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900TE
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,602 vs 21,845).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.2 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($554 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $255 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 96.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 37.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-13900TE
2023Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $255 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 96.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 37.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,602 vs 21,845).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.2 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($554 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900TE better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900TE | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900TE | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 415 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900TE | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 515 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 483 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 515 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 429 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900TE | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 515 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 515 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 515 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 515 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 515 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900TE and Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i9-13900TE
Core i9-13900TE
The Core i9-13900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,602 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900TE packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-13900TE has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-13900TE versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900TE (base: 1 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-13900TE uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900TE scores 20,602 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 5.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900TE vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i9-13900TE | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+9% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 3.7 GHz+270% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+13% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 20,602 | 21,845+6% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900TE versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the Core i9-13900TE supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900TE) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-13900TE) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).
| Feature | Core i9-13900TE | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-13900TE supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900TE) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). The Core i9-13900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 5600X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-13900TE | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13900TE launched at $554 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($554 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $255 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900TE delivers 37.2 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 65.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900TE | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $554 | $299-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.2 | 73.1+97% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











