
Core i9-13900KS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900KS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +49.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 18.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.6 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌133.8% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900KS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 60,543).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 86.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900KS moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900KS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-13900KS
2023Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +49.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 18.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.6 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌133.8% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900KS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 60,543).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 86.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900KS moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900KS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900KS better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 790 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 688 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 550 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 597 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 400 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 336 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 794 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 660 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 711 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 412 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1089 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 975 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 853 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 760 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 899 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 791 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 690 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 607 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 661 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 592 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 523 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900KS and Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i9-13900KS
Core i9-13900KS
The Core i9-13900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,543 points. Launch price was $699.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900KS packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-13900KS has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core i9-13900KS versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 23.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900KS (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-13900KS uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900KS scores 60,543 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 93.9% lead for the Core i9-13900KS. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900KS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.8 GHz+26% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+13% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 60,543+177% | 21,845 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 40,998 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,123 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 21,421 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900KS uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900KS versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the Core i9-13900KS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-13900KS supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900KS) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i9-13900KS) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i9-13900KS) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). The Core i9-13900KS includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 5600X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900KS rivals Ryzen 9 7950X.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13900KS launched at $699 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($699 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $400 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900KS delivers 86.6 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Core i9-13900KS the 17% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $299-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 86.6+18% | 73.1 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












