
Core i9-13900K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +44.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 33.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 97.5 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌100.3% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 58,373).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 97.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-13900K
2022Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +44.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 33.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 97.5 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌100.3% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 58,373).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 97.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900K better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900K | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900K | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 756 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 658 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 472 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 390 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 355 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900K | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 628 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 468 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 683 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 570 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 503 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900K | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1034 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 926 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 812 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 722 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 757 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 663 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 634 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i9-13900K
Core i9-13900K
The Core i9-13900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 58,373 points. Launch price was $589.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900K packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-13900K has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-13900K versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 21.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900K (base: 3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-13900K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900K scores 58,373 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 91.1% lead for the Core i9-13900K. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900K vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i9-13900K | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+24% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.7 GHz+23% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+13% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 58,373+167% | 21,845 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 40,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,985 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,967 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900K versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the Core i9-13900K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-13900K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900K) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel Z690 (Core i9-13900K) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).
| Feature | Core i9-13900K | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i9-13900K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). The Core i9-13900K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 5600X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900K targets Desktop, Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-13900K | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13900K launched at $599 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($599 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $300 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900K delivers 97.5 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Core i9-13900K the 28.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900K | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $299-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 97.5+33% | 73.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












