
Core i9-13900E
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900E
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.3% HIGHER MSRP$554 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $255 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 40,476).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-13900E
2023Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $255 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.3% HIGHER MSRP$554 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 40,476).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900E better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 293 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1012 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 1012 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 977 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 838 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 991 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 881 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 793 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 599 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1012 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 1012 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 935 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 810 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 1010 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 881 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 761 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 756 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 662 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 578 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900E and Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i9-13900E
Core i9-13900E
The Core i9-13900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,476 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900E packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-13900E has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-13900E versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900E (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-13900E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900E scores 40,476 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 59.8% lead for the Core i9-13900E. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900E vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+13% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz+106% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+13% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 40,476+85% | 21,845 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,606 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900E versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the Core i9-13900E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900E) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W680,Q670,Z790,H770 (Core i9-13900E) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).
| Feature | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900E) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). The Core i9-13900E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 5600X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900E targets Embedded, Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Embedded | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13900E launched at $554 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($554 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $255 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900E delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Core i9-13900E the 0% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $554 | $299-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1 | 73.1 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












