
Core i9-11900F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-11900F
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900F across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 22,052).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i9-11900F mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i9-11900F
2021Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900F across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 22,052).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i9-11900F mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-11900F better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-11900F | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-11900F | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 390 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 346 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 328 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-11900F | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 551 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 551 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 504 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 433 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 445 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-11900F | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 551 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 551 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 551 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 551 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 551 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-11900F and Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i9-11900F
Core i9-11900F
The Core i9-11900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,052 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-11900F packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-11900F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-11900F versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-11900F uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900F scores 22,052 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i9-11900F. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900F vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i9-11900F | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+11% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+48% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 22,052 | 21,845 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-11900F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-11900F | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-11900F) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-11900F | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












