
Core i7-4930K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-4930K
2013Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,379 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($670 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +42.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $371 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 421.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-4930K
2013Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +42.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $371 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 421.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,379 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($670 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Core i7-4930K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-4930K | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-4930K | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-4930K | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-4930K | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4930K and Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i7-4930K
Core i7-4930K
The Core i7-4930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,379 points. Launch price was $670.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-4930K and Ryzen 5 5600X share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4930K versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 16.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-4930K uses the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4930K scores 9,379 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 79.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-4930K vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i7-4930K | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.6 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 32 MB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge-E (2013) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 9,379 | 21,845+133% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4930K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4930K | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4930K) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-4930K | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-4930K launched at $670 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($670 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $371 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4930K delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 135.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4930K | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $670 | $299-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.0 | 73.1+422% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











