
Core i7-13800H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13800H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13800H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 26,349).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i7-13800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13800H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core i7-13800H
2023Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13800H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 26,349).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i7-13800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13800H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13800H better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 659 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 659 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 659 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 659 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 659 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 659 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 551 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13800H and Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i7-13800H
Core i7-13800H
The Core i7-13800H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 26,349 points. Launch price was $457.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13800H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-13800H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13800H versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13800H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-13800H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13800H scores 26,349 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 18.7% lead for the Core i7-13800H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13800H vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+13% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+48% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 26,349+21% | 21,845 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13800H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-13800H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












