PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 45.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.4 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes (Intel Laminar RM1)), unlike Ryzen 5 5600X.

Trade-offs

❌
20.1% HIGHER MSRP
$359 MSRPvs$299 MSRP

Ryzen 5 5600X

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700F across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 38,212).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 106.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700F.

Core i7-13700F

2023

Ryzen 5 5600X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 45.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.4 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes (Intel Laminar RM1)), unlike Ryzen 5 5600X.

Why buy it

✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
20.1% HIGHER MSRP
$359 MSRPvs$299 MSRP

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700F across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 38,212).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 106.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700F better than Ryzen 5 5600X?

Yes. Core i7-13700F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 10.7% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data, 74.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 10.7% more average FPS across 47 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700F is the better fit. You are getting 74.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700F is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700F is 20.1% more expensive on MSRP at $359 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 45.7% better value on MSRP (106.4 vs 73.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 5 5600X can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 5600X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	264 FPS	203 FPS
medium	254 FPS	174 FPS
high	210 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	107 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	169 FPS
medium	193 FPS	141 FPS
high	153 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	154 FPS	85 FPS
medium	131 FPS	76 FPS
high	101 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	47 FPS

Open Core i7-13700F Open Ryzen 5 5600X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	344 FPS	464 FPS
medium	293 FPS	387 FPS
high	247 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	291 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	397 FPS
medium	264 FPS	334 FPS
high	224 FPS	290 FPS
ultra	192 FPS	253 FPS
4K
low	177 FPS	263 FPS
medium	160 FPS	226 FPS
high	152 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	171 FPS

Open Core i7-13700F Open Ryzen 5 5600X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	647 FPS	546 FPS
medium	530 FPS	473 FPS
high	467 FPS	432 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	358 FPS
1440p
low	590 FPS	508 FPS
medium	491 FPS	413 FPS
high	427 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	312 FPS
4K
low	433 FPS	348 FPS
medium	373 FPS	292 FPS
high	338 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	289 FPS	199 FPS

Open Core i7-13700F Open Ryzen 5 5600X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	936 FPS	546 FPS
medium	851 FPS	546 FPS
high	735 FPS	546 FPS
ultra	660 FPS	546 FPS
1440p
low	799 FPS	546 FPS
medium	712 FPS	546 FPS
high	615 FPS	546 FPS
ultra	542 FPS	524 FPS
4K
low	548 FPS	529 FPS
medium	497 FPS	484 FPS
high	444 FPS	435 FPS
ultra	388 FPS	379 FPS

Open Core i7-13700F Open Ryzen 5 5600X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700F and Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i7-13700F

The Core i7-13700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,212 points. Launch price was $359.

Ryzen 5 5600X

The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-13700F has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700F versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-13700F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700F scores 38,212 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 54.5% lead for the Core i7-13700F. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700F vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 5 5600X
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+167%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+13%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.7 GHz+76%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	32 MB+7%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	38,212+75%	21,845
Cinebench R23 Multi	24,775	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,676	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,254	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the Core i7-13700F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700F) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i7-13700F) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 5 5600X
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Core i7-13700F targets High-end Gaming, Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700F rivals Ryzen 7 7700X.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 5 5600X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V
Target Use	High-end Gaming	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700F launched at $359 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($359 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $60 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700F delivers 106.4 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Core i7-13700F the 37.2% better value option.