PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-14400F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $103 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 79.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 131.0 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).

Ryzen 5 5600X

2020

Why buy it

✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14400F across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 25,670).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 131.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-14400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-14400F

2024

Ryzen 5 5600X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $103 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 79.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 131.0 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14400F across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 25,670).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 131.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-14400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-14400F better than Ryzen 5 5600X?

Yes. Core i5-14400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 3.9% average FPS lead across 41 shared CPU game tests in our data, 17.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-14400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 41 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-14400F is the better fit. You are getting 17.5% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-14400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-14400F is $103 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 41 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 79.3% better value on MSRP (131.0 vs 73.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 5 5600X can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-14400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-14400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 5600X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-14400F	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	170 FPS	203 FPS
medium	154 FPS	174 FPS
high	126 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	107 FPS
1440p
low	145 FPS	169 FPS
medium	126 FPS	141 FPS
high	100 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	85 FPS
medium	76 FPS	76 FPS
high	61 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	47 FPS

Open Core i5-14400F Open Ryzen 5 5600X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-14400F	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	548 FPS	464 FPS
medium	466 FPS	387 FPS
high	390 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	354 FPS	291 FPS
1440p
low	457 FPS	397 FPS
medium	402 FPS	334 FPS
high	345 FPS	290 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	253 FPS
4K
low	275 FPS	263 FPS
medium	244 FPS	226 FPS
high	229 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	202 FPS	171 FPS

Open Core i5-14400F Open Ryzen 5 5600X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-14400F	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	642 FPS	546 FPS
medium	610 FPS	473 FPS
high	540 FPS	432 FPS
ultra	458 FPS	358 FPS
1440p
low	642 FPS	508 FPS
medium	548 FPS	413 FPS
high	479 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	411 FPS	312 FPS
4K
low	494 FPS	348 FPS
medium	412 FPS	292 FPS
high	370 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	311 FPS	199 FPS

Open Core i5-14400F Open Ryzen 5 5600X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-14400F	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	642 FPS	546 FPS
medium	642 FPS	546 FPS
high	642 FPS	546 FPS
ultra	596 FPS	546 FPS
1440p
low	642 FPS	546 FPS
medium	642 FPS	546 FPS
high	565 FPS	546 FPS
ultra	493 FPS	524 FPS
4K
low	515 FPS	529 FPS
medium	471 FPS	484 FPS
high	418 FPS	435 FPS
ultra	363 FPS	379 FPS

Open Core i5-14400F Open Ryzen 5 5600X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14400F and Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i5-14400F

The Core i5-14400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,670 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen 5 5600X

The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-14400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-14400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-14400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-14400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-14400F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14400F scores 25,670 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 16.1% lead for the Core i5-14400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-14400F vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.

Feature	Core i5-14400F	Ryzen 5 5600X
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+2%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.7 GHz+48%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	32 MB+60%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	25,670+18%	21,845

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-14400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-14400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the Core i5-14400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-14400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-14400F) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i5-14400F	Ryzen 5 5600X
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Core i5-14400F targets Desktop, Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i5-14400F	Ryzen 5 5600X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Desktop	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-14400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($196 vs $299), the Core i5-14400F is $103 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-14400F delivers 131.0 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Core i5-14400F the 56.8% better value option.