
Core i5-11260H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-11260H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,459 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i5-11260H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Core i5-11260H
2021Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,459 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i5-11260H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Core i5-11260H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-11260H | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-11260H | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-11260H | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-11260H | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11260H and Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i5-11260H
Core i5-11260H
The Core i5-11260H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,459 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-11260H and Ryzen 5 5600X share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-11260H versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-11260H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11260H scores 15,459 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 34.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11260H vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i5-11260H | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+42% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 32 MB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H (2021) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 15,459 | 21,845+41% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11260H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-11260H | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-11260H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-11260H | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











