
Ryzen 5 5500GT
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2682 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5500GT
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 7, while Xeon E5-2682 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2682 v4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,846 vs 18,971).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2682 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $125 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2682 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2682 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 5500GT can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5500GT.
Ryzen 5 5500GT
2024Xeon E5-2682 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 7, while Xeon E5-2682 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2682 v4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,846 vs 18,971).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2682 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $125 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2682 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 5500GT can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5500GT.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5500GT better than Xeon E5-2682 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5500GT | Xeon E5-2682 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5500GT | Xeon E5-2682 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 287 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5500GT | Xeon E5-2682 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 471 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 287 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 239 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5500GT | Xeon E5-2682 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 471 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 471 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 471 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 355 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5500GT and Xeon E5-2682 v4


Ryzen 5 5500GT
Ryzen 5 5500GT
The Ryzen 5 5500GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,846 points. Launch price was $125.

Xeon E5-2682 v4
Xeon E5-2682 v4
The Xeon E5-2682 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,971 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5500GT packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2682 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5500GT versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2682 v4 — a 55.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5500GT. The Ryzen 5 5500GT uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5500GT scores 18,846 against the Xeon E5-2682 v4's 18,971 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2682 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 5500GT vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2682 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5500GT | Xeon E5-2682 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+76% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 40 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 4 MB+700% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne (2021−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 18,846 | 18,971 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,412 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,514 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5500GT uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses FCLGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5500GT | Xeon E5-2682 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCLGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5500GT) / not specified (Xeon E5-2682 v4). The Ryzen 5 5500GT includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 7), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5500GT targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 5500GT rivals Core i5-12400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5500GT | Xeon E5-2682 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 7 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












