
Core i7-10700
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 4600GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-10700
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 4600GE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.0 vs 79.4 PassMark/$ ($365 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 4600GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $165 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $365 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 80.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 79.4 vs 44.0 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $365 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (7,800 vs 12,250).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-10700.
Core i7-10700
2020Ryzen 5 4600GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 4600GE.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $165 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $365 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 80.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 79.4 vs 44.0 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $365 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.0 vs 79.4 PassMark/$ ($365 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (7,800 vs 12,250).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-10700.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-10700 better than Ryzen 5 4600GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-10700 | Ryzen 5 4600GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-10700 | Ryzen 5 4600GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 402 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 273 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 156 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-10700 | Ryzen 5 4600GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 362 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-10700 | Ryzen 5 4600GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 402 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 316 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-10700 and Ryzen 5 4600GE

Core i7-10700
Core i7-10700
The Core i7-10700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,067 points. Launch price was $340.


Ryzen 5 4600GE
Ryzen 5 4600GE
The Ryzen 5 4600GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,889 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-10700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 4600GE offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-10700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10700 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600GE — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-10700 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 4600GE uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700 scores 16,067 against the Ryzen 5 4600GE's 15,889 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-10700. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,250 vs 7,800 (44.4% advantage for the Core i7-10700). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600GE.
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Ryzen 5 4600GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+14% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.3 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 16,067+1% | 15,889 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,250+57% | 7,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,597 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,926 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-10700 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 4600GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Core i7-10700 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-10700) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 4600GE) — the Ryzen 5 4600GE offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B460,H470,Z490,B560,Z590 (Core i7-10700) and AM4 (Ryzen 5 4600GE).
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Ryzen 5 4600GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10700) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 4600GE). Both include integrated graphics — UHD 630 (Core i7-10700) and Radeon Vega 7 (Ryzen 5 4600GE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700 rivals Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Ryzen 5 4600GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD 630 | Radeon Vega 7 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-10700 launched at $365 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 4600GE debuted at $200. On MSRP ($365 vs $200), the Ryzen 5 4600GE is $165 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-10700 delivers 44.0 pts/$ vs 79.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 4600GE — making the Ryzen 5 4600GE the 57.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Ryzen 5 4600GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $365 | $200-45% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.0 | 79.4+80% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











