Ryzen 5 240
Popular choices:
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 240
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 240 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 23,167).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 240 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 240
2025Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 240 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 23,167).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 240 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 240 better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 47 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 171 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 520 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 445 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 199 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 545 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 565 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 240 and Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 240
Ryzen 5 240
The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.
Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 240 and Ryzen 5 5600X share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 240 (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 240 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 240 scores 23,167 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 5.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 240. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 240 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+9% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+16% | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 23,167+6% | 21,845 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 240 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 240) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 240 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($0 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 240 is $299 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 73.1 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 5 240 and Ryzen 5 5600X
