
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Ryzen 5 240
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,167 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen 5 240
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,167 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen 5 240?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 271 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 183 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 520 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 386 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 5 240

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen 5 240
Ryzen 5 240
The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 240 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 5 240's 23,167 — a 47.6% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 240.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+2% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz+23% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 37,655+63% | 23,167 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 240). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 240 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($329 vs $0), the Ryzen 5 240 is $329 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












