
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 240.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 240 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 23,167).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Ryzen 5 240
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen 5 240
2025Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 240.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 240 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 23,167).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 240 better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 271 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 183 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 520 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 386 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 240

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen 5 240
Ryzen 5 240
The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 240 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 240 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 5 240's 23,167 — a 17% lead for the Ryzen 5 240. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 240.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz+72% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 23,167+19% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 240). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 240 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($174 vs $0), the Ryzen 5 240 is $174 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











