
Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-4620 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4620 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4620 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon E5-4620 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,424 vs 9,493).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $273 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
2020Xeon E5-4620 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4620 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4620 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,424 vs 9,493).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $273 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U better than Xeon E5-4620 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U | Xeon E5-4620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U | Xeon E5-4620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 112 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U | Xeon E5-4620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 236 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U | Xeon E5-4620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 236 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U and Xeon E5-4620 v2


Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
The Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 9,493 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4620 v2
Xeon E5-4620 v2
The Xeon E5-4620 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 9,424 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4620 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4620 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4620 v2 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U is built on the Renoir PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U scores 9,493 against the Xeon E5-4620 v2's 9,424 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U vs 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E5-4620 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U | Xeon E5-4620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+23% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache+400% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir PRO (Zen 2) (2020) | — |
| PassMark | 9,493 | 9,424 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4620 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U | Xeon E5-4620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












