
Ryzen 3 8300G
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2235
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 8300G
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $379 less on MSRP ($176 MSRP vs $555 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 212.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 80.2 vs 25.6 PassMark/$ ($176 MSRP vs $555 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,113 vs 14,235).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2235, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Xeon W-2235
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300G across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.6 vs 80.2 PassMark/$ ($555 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 3 8300G
2024Xeon W-2235
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $379 less on MSRP ($176 MSRP vs $555 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 212.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 80.2 vs 25.6 PassMark/$ ($176 MSRP vs $555 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,113 vs 14,235).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2235, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300G across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.6 vs 80.2 PassMark/$ ($555 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 8300G better than Xeon W-2235?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 8300G | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 8300G | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 151 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 8300G | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 292 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 8300G | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 8300G and Xeon W-2235


Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G
The Ryzen 3 8300G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,113 points. Launch price was $176.

Xeon W-2235
Xeon W-2235
The Xeon W-2235 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 14,235 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 8300G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W-2235 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W-2235 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8300G versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-2235 — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 8300G (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 3 8300G is built on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 8300G scores 14,113 against the Xeon W-2235's 14,235 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon W-2235. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8300G vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon W-2235.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 8300G | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+7% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8.25 MB+3% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix2 (2024) | — |
| PassMark | 14,113 | 14,235 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 8300G uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2235 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 8300G | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 8300G launched at $176 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2235 debuted at $555. On MSRP ($176 vs $555), the Ryzen 3 8300G is $379 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 8300G delivers 80.2 pts/$ vs 25.6 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2235 — making the Ryzen 3 8300G the 103.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 8300G | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $176-68% | $555 |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.2+213% | 25.6 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











