
Ryzen 3 4300GE
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2670 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 4300GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,462 less on MSRP ($94 MSRP vs $1,556 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1539.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 119.6 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($94 MSRP vs $1,556 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 115W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 6, while Xeon E5-2670 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2670 v2.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2670 v2 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,239 vs 11,346).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2670 v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2670 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+525% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 119.6 PassMark/$ ($1,556 MSRP vs $94 MSRP).
- ❌228.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 4300GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 4300GE.
Ryzen 3 4300GE
2020Xeon E5-2670 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,462 less on MSRP ($94 MSRP vs $1,556 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1539.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 119.6 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($94 MSRP vs $1,556 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 115W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 6, while Xeon E5-2670 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2670 v2.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+525% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2670 v2 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,239 vs 11,346).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2670 v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 119.6 PassMark/$ ($1,556 MSRP vs $94 MSRP).
- ❌228.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 4300GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 4300GE.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2670 v2 better than Ryzen 3 4300GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4300GE | Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4300GE | Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 111 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4300GE | Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 239 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4300GE | Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 4300GE and Xeon E5-2670 v2


Ryzen 3 4300GE
Ryzen 3 4300GE
The Ryzen 3 4300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 11,239 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2670 v2
Xeon E5-2670 v2
The Xeon E5-2670 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 11,346 points. Launch price was $927.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 4300GE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2670 v2 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2670 v2 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 4300GE versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2670 v2 — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 4300GE (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 3 4300GE uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2670 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 4300GE scores 11,239 against the Xeon E5-2670 v2's 11,346 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2670 v2. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 4300GE vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2670 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 4300GE | Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 10 / 20+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+21% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+40% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+525% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 11,239 | 11,346 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,800 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,472 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,063 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 4300GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2670 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 3 4300GE versus DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2670 v2 — the Ryzen 3 4300GE supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2670 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 3 4300GE) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2670 v2). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 3 4300GE) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2670 v2) — the Xeon E5-2670 v2 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A520,B450,B550,X470,X570 (Ryzen 3 4300GE) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2670 v2).
| Feature | Ryzen 3 4300GE | Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+33% | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 768 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 3 4300GE) / not specified (Xeon E5-2670 v2). The Ryzen 3 4300GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 6), while the Xeon E5-2670 v2 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 4300GE | Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 6 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 4300GE launched at $94 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2670 v2 debuted at $1556. On MSRP ($94 vs $1556), the Ryzen 3 4300GE is $1462 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 4300GE delivers 119.6 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2670 v2 — making the Ryzen 3 4300GE the 177% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 4300GE | Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $94-94% | $1556 |
| Performance per Dollar | 119.6+1538% | 7.3 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













