
Ryzen 3 4300GE
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2640 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 4300GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $845 less on MSRP ($94 MSRP vs $939 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 915.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 119.6 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($94 MSRP vs $939 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 90W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 6, while Xeon E5-2640 v3 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2640 v3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2640 v3, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2640 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,055 vs 11,239).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 119.6 PassMark/$ ($939 MSRP vs $94 MSRP).
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 90W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 4300GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 4300GE.
Ryzen 3 4300GE
2020Xeon E5-2640 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $845 less on MSRP ($94 MSRP vs $939 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 915.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 119.6 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($94 MSRP vs $939 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 90W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 6, while Xeon E5-2640 v3 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2640 v3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2640 v3, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,055 vs 11,239).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 119.6 PassMark/$ ($939 MSRP vs $94 MSRP).
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 90W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 4300GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 4300GE.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 4300GE better than Xeon E5-2640 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4300GE | Xeon E5-2640 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4300GE | Xeon E5-2640 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 114 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4300GE | Xeon E5-2640 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 239 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4300GE | Xeon E5-2640 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 4300GE and Xeon E5-2640 v3


Ryzen 3 4300GE
Ryzen 3 4300GE
The Ryzen 3 4300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 11,239 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2640 v3
Xeon E5-2640 v3
The Xeon E5-2640 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 11,055 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 4300GE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2640 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 4300GE versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v3 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 4300GE (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 3 4300GE uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 4300GE scores 11,239 against the Xeon E5-2640 v3's 11,055 — a 1.7% lead for the Ryzen 3 4300GE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 4300GE vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2640 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 4300GE | Xeon E5-2640 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+18% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+35% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+400% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 11,239+2% | 11,055 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,800 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,472 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,063 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 4300GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2640 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 3 4300GE) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2640 v3). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 3 4300GE) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2640 v3) — the Xeon E5-2640 v3 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A520,B450,B550,X470,X570 (Ryzen 3 4300GE) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2640 v3).
| Feature | Ryzen 3 4300GE | Xeon E5-2640 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 768 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon E5-2640 v3 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 3 4300GE) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2640 v3). The Ryzen 3 4300GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 6), while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2640 v3 targets Server.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 4300GE | Xeon E5-2640 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 6 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 4300GE launched at $94 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2640 v3 debuted at $939. On MSRP ($94 vs $939), the Ryzen 3 4300GE is $845 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 4300GE delivers 119.6 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2640 v3 — making the Ryzen 3 4300GE the 164.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 4300GE | Xeon E5-2640 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $94-90% | $939 |
| Performance per Dollar | 119.6+914% | 11.8 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













