
Ryzen 3 1200
Popular choices:

Xeon E7330
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 1200
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon E7330.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,407 vs 6,491).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.8 vs 101.4 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
Xeon E7330
2007Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $45 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 72.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 101.4 vs 58.8 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 1200 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1200.
Ryzen 3 1200
2017Xeon E7330
2007Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon E7330.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $45 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 72.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 101.4 vs 58.8 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,407 vs 6,491).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.8 vs 101.4 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 1200 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1200.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 1200 better than Xeon E7330?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 1200 | Xeon E7330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 1200 | Xeon E7330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 1200 | Xeon E7330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 162 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 1200 | Xeon E7330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon E7330


Ryzen 3 1200
Ryzen 3 1200
The Ryzen 3 1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,407 points. Launch price was $109.

Xeon E7330
Xeon E7330
The Xeon E7330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 6,491 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 1200 is built on the Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 1200 scores 6,407 against the Xeon E7330's 6,491 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E7330. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 1200 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E7330.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1200 | Xeon E7330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | — |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+29% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+33% | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) | — |
| PassMark | 6,407 | 6,491+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,013 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 1200 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7330 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1200 | Xeon E7330 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | PGA604 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1200) / not specified (Xeon E7330). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1200 targets Budget.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1200 | Xeon E7330 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 1200 launched at $109 MSRP, while the Xeon E7330 debuted at $64. On MSRP ($109 vs $64), the Xeon E7330 is $45 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 1200 delivers 58.8 pts/$ vs 101.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E7330 — making the Xeon E7330 the 53.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1200 | Xeon E7330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109 | $64-41% |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.8 | 101.4+72% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













