
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:

RTX A400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+177.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 39.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌230% higher power demand at 165W vs 50W.
RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $134 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 165W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,983 vs 16,581).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7600 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.3 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7600
2023RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅+177.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 39.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $134 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 165W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌230% higher power demand at 165W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,983 vs 16,581).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7600 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.3 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than RTX A400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A400 make more sense than Radeon RX 7600?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 597 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 67 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 517 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 468 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and RTX A400

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.

RTX A400
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the RTX A400's 5,983 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 177.1%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1762 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon RX 7600) vs 6 (RTX A400) vs 24.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+177% | 5,983 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+704% | 2.706 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+51% | 1762 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+433% | 6 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A400 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A400 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A400 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 107% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 50W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5 | 119.7+19% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP, while the RTX A400 launched at $135. The RTX A400 costs 49.8% less ($134 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 39.1% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | $135-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.6+39% | 44.3 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GA107 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #118 | #397 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












