
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅16.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 45W.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 165W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 61.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7600
2023RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅16.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 165W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 61.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile better than Radeon RX 7600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7600 make more sense than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 597 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 470 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 381 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 153 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 517 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 468 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 76 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1657 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,940 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 and the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile reaches 16,940 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 3,328 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 11.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1657 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon RX 7600) vs 26 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 104.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581 | 16,940+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3328+63% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+97% | 11.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+60% | 1657 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+23% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3.3 MB+560% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+23% | 26 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile's 45W — a 114.3% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 650W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 45W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5 | 376.4+275% |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | — |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GB206 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | March 19 2025 |
| Ranking | #118 | #156 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












