
Radeon R9 M395X
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 M395X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 165W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌123% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅133.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 622.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌120% higher power demand at 165W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M395X
2015Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 165W, a 90W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅133.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 622.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌123% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌120% higher power demand at 165W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than Radeon R9 M395X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M395X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 M395X | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 M395X | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 M395X | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 M395X | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M395X and Radeon RX 7600

Radeon R9 M395X
Radeon R9 M395X
The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R9 M395X scores 5,120 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 223.8%. The Radeon R9 M395X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395X | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,120 | 16,581+224% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.961 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+635% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 M395X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395X | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M395X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) — a 80% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395X | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 288 GB/s+80% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M395X draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 75% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395X | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-55% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.3 | 100.5+47% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 55.2% less ($331 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.5 (Radeon R9 M395X) vs 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 624.7% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395X | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $269-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.5 | 61.6+625% |
| Codename | Amethyst | Navi 33 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #438 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













